| If
it weren't for one thing, we could be celebrating the 100th anniversary of
the birth of the greatest batsman of all time. Walter Hammond, who was
born on June 19, 1903, played 85 times for England over almost 20 years,
and averaged 58.45 in Tests. In first-class cricket that average was 56,
from over 50,000 runs.
The snag, though,
was one that bugged Hammond for most of his career - Donald Bradman. The
Don, in his debut series, was an interested observer when Hammond broke
the Test record with 905 runs in the 1928-29 Ashes series, and Bradman
smashed the record himself with 974 in the next rubber, in 1930. It still
stands. Hammond hit 36 double-centuries in his career, more than anyone
else ... except Bradman, who pipped him by one.
Hammond was a
famously moody character, and his humour can hardly have been improved by
those constant comparisons with the incomparable.
In many ways Hammond
was a more correct player than Bradman. He was tall and imposing at the
crease, and his cover-drive was a thing of beauty. Uniquely, he was the
leading Englishman in the batting averages for eight successive seasons
(1933-46), and topped 3000 runs three times. He was a handy bowler, with
732 first-class wickets. And he caught like a flytrap, usually at slip -
he took 10 catches (a record) in a county match in 1928, and 78 (another
record) all told that season.
His career stalled
early on, thanks to the sharp-eyed administrator Lord Harris. In those
days (1920) the qualification regulations were very strict, and Harris, a
Man of Kent, objected to Hammond playing for Gloucestershire when he had
been born in Dover. But Hammond made up for lost time when he was allowed
to play, before a mysterious illness contracted in the West Indies in
1925-26 kept him out of the whole of the following season.
Hammond's biographer
David Foot suggested that this was what is euphemistically known as a
"social disease" (surely antisocial would be more appropriate?),
and that it accounted for Hammond's mood-swings later in life. Whatever
the reason, his Wisden obituary refers to an "almost Olympian
aloofness", and his Gloucestershire team-mates were never quite sure
how he would react to anything.
He started as a
professional, albeit a somewhat superior one, and back then it was
unthinkable that a pro should captain England. But in 1938 there weren't
many suitable unpaid candidates, and Hammond "turned amateur".
He wasn't a great success as England captain (Bradman again), winning only
four of his 20 matches in charge. That included a rather sad farewell tour
of Australia in 1946-47, when he was troubled by fibrositis and gave only
glimpses of his former glories with the bat. Again, it didn't help that
The Don, who hadn't been expected to play, turned up and reeled off scores
of 187, 234, 79, 49, 0, 56*, 12 and 63.
That was the end of
Hammond's serious cricket, apart from couple of mildly embarrassing
appearances in 1950 and 1951. These days Hammond would be a hero, feted
everywhere and a regular in the commentary box - but, prematurely aged, he
disappeared to South Africa, where he struggled to find work. He was never
the same after a car crash in the early 1960s, and died in Durban in 1965,
aged only 62.
You could argue for
Hobbs or Sutcliffe or Woolley or Grace or Boycott as England's greatest
batsman. But I have a hunch that it was Walter Reginald Hammond.
Steven Lynch is
editor of Wisden CricInfo.
© Wisden CricInfo
Ltd
|